CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF POST-CONFLICT TERRITORIES
Zavarika H.
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5601-9331
Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, Severodonetsk, Ukraine
Abstract:
The theory of post-conflict development of territories as an actual topic for Ukraine is studied. The methodology of research of the theory of post-conflict development of territories, which consists of applying the idea of geocybernetics and probabilism, is proposed. It is established that the post-conflict development of territories refers to large-scale General geographical issues, which will be addressed by representatives of many Sciences. Therefore, the study presents various points of view, which made it possible to form the author’s vision of post-conflict tourism development as a geographical system. A theoretical model of post-conflict tourism development as a system has been developed. It is established on the example of countries of the world that the Genesis of conflicts has a different character, but in the post-conflict period, similar results should be taken into account when overcoming the post-conflict situation in the Eastern territories. It is proposed to introduce a “model of post-conflict green development” in the old industrial Eastern territories of Ukraine, which should contain: effective use of regional potential; increasing the share of high-tech industrial sectors; the increasing role of services sector: business, tourist, recreation, social; improving the business climate and business activity; alternative energy development; ecological modernization of production and introduction of energy-saving technologies in production; change the behavior of economic actors; extensive landscaping; restructuring works at abandoned coal mines and other industrial plants; remediation of numerous waste heaps. The creation of a forest Park zone in the zone of the current confrontation in the Donbass, the organization of recreation places there in the future will contribute to the establishment of peaceful life, the establishment of ecological balance in the region, and overcoming existing problems of socio-economic development. It is proposed to use the “tourist and recreational” development path in these territories, which can become the first, least capital-intensive step in the future renewal of the East of Ukraine.
Keywords: post-conflict territory, geokinematics, probabilism, Genesis, conflict, and tourism
Language:
Ukrainian
DOI: http://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2020.76-77.8
References:
1. ABV. Zbrojny’j konflikt v terminax (Putivny’k dlya Ukrayiny’) / D. Ducy’k ta in. Ky’yiv, 2019.
2. Braun G., Langer A., Styuart F. Ty’pologiya postkonfliktny’x sy’tuacij. Bel’giya, 2011.
3. Vsemy’rnyj bank. Obnovlennye svedeny’ya o global’nom urovne bednosty’. Vsemy’rnyj bank: vebsajt. URL: https://www.vsemirnyjbank.org/ ru/topic/poverty/brief/global-poverty-line-faq
4. Geecz V. K voprosu pry’meneny’ya podxodov “plana Marshalla” dlya Ukray’nbi. Эkonomy’ka Ukray’nbi. 2015. # 4. S. 6-11.
5. Zavarika G. Vidnovlennya tury’zmu Luganshhy’ny’ u postkonfliktny’j period: suspil’no-geografichny’j aspekt. Visny’k Ky’yivs’kogo nacional’nogo universy’tetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Geografiya. 2018. Vy’p. 1(70). S. 88-93.
6. Zavarika G. Suspil’no-geografichne doslidzhennya bezpeky’ tury’zmu v umovax globalizaciyi i konfliktiv. Naukovy’j visny’k Xersons’kogo derzhavnogo universy’tetu. Seriya “Geografichni nauky'”. 2018. # 9. S. 45-50.
7. Muzaffarly’ N., Y’smay’lov Э. K voprosu o vosstanovleny’y’ postkonfly’ktnyx terry’tory’j. Kavkaz y’ Globaly’zacy’ya. 2009. # 3 (23). S. 7-28.
8. Ofy’cy’al’nbij sajt Vsemy’rnogo эkonomy’cheskogo foruma (WEF). URL: http://www.weforum.org/
9. Oficijny’j sajt OON v Ukrayini. URL: http://www.un.org.ua/ua/
10. Fy’sher M. Posle vooruzhennogo konfly’kta: vosstanovleny’e razrushennogo y’ rey’ntegracy’ya obshhestva kak эlementы postroeny’ya my’ra. Bergxof: Bergxofsky’j y’ssledovatel’sky’j centr konstrukty’vnogo ureguly’- rovany’ya konfly’ktov. S. 474-501. URL: http://www.berghoffoundation.org/ fileadmin/redaktion/Publications/handbook/Articles/russian_fischer_handbook.pdf
11. Yakovenko R. Tlumachny’j anglo-ukrayins’ky’j slovny’k ekonomichny’x terminiv z elementamy’ teoriyi ta problematy’ky’ : dy’dakty’- chny’j dovidny’k. Kirovograd, 2015
12. University of Maryland, Institute for Economics and Peace: Global Terrorism Index 2017. The official website. URL: https://www.start.umd.edu/ news/institute-economics-and-peace-releases-global-terrorism-index
13. Crisis Prevention and Recovery Report 2008 – Post-Conflict Economic Recovery: Enabling Local Ingenuity. New York, 2008. URL: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/crisis%_20prevention/undp_ cpr_post_conflict_economic_recovery_enable_local_ingenuity_report_2008.pdf
14. Collier P. On economic causes of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers. 1998. # 50. P. 563-573. URL: https://asso’sherpa.org/sherpa’content/ docs.programmes/GDH/Campagne_RC/War.pdf
15. Coyne S. Reconstruction and Reconciliation: What’s Economics Got to Do With It? The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations. 2017. 4 (1). pp. 69-83.
16. USAID. Official Website. URL: https://www.usaid.gov/who-we- are/mission-vision-values
Suggested citation:
Zavarika H., 2020. Conceptual approaches to the development of post-conflict territories. Visnyk Kyivskogo nacionalnogo universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Geografiya [Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Geography], 1/2 (76/77), 58-63 (in Ukranian, abstr. in English), doi: 10.17721/1728-2721.2020.76-77.8
Received Editorial Board 15.07.2020
Accepted for publication 12.11.2020