THE ROLE OF FOREIGN ECONOMIC RELATIONS IN THE FORMATION OF METROPOLITAN REGIONS
Savchuk I.
Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev
Abstract:
The role of foreign economic relations in the formation of metropolitan regions is disclosed. The author defines the main existing theoretical and methodological approaches to their study within the leading national geographical schools of different countries of the world and presents the definitions of the concepts “metropolis”, “metropolitan region”, “metropolization” existing in each of them. The theoretical and methodological specifics of the normative, functional, and morphological approaches in studying the metropolitanization process are determined and the national specificity of the German, Italian, Anglo-Saxon, Russian, Ukrainian national geourbanistics schools is revealed in revealing the features of this process in connection with foreign economic activity as the determining indicator for the allocation of metropolises. It is proved that, despite the differences in the theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of the metropolization process in each of the mentioned national schools, foreign economic relations are predominant in the formation of the metropolis. The difference is only in different emphases on their different constituents. In some national scientific schools, attention is focused on the location of the headquarters of the world’s leading companies, in others – on the availability of special infrastructure for the implementation of foreign economic relations, in the third – on the exclusive role of congresses, forums, exhibitions in their development. This is largely due to the study within each of the national scientific schools of the cities of their country.
Keywords:
metropolization, foreign economic relations, national scientific schools.
Language:
Ukrainian
DOI: http://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2018.70.22
References:
1. Druzhinin A.G. Prostranstvennoye razvitiye goroda-millionera : tendentsii postsovetskom perioda : monografiya. – Rostov na-Donu: Izd-vo YUFU, 2008. – 192 s.
2. Druzhinin A.G. Metropolizatsiya kak dominantnaya tendentsiya territorial’noy organizatsii obshchestva v postsovetstkom period: universal’nyye proyavleniya i yuzhno-russkaya spetsifika // Geograficheskiy vestnik [Nauchnyy zhurnal Permskogo un-ta]. – 2009. – №3. – [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa:http://www.geo-vestnik.psu.ru/files/vest/174_metropolizaciq_kak_dominantnaq_tendenciq.pdf
3. Zagazhdzhon A. Industrializiruyemyy rayon i territorial’no-proizvodstvennyy kompleks (na primere Nizhnesilezskogo mednorudnogo okrestnosti) / Metody i modeli regional’nogo analiza. Mat-ly vtorogo sovetsko-pol’skogo simpoziuma «Modeli territorial’nykh sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem». – Novosibirsk: In-t ekonomiki i organizatsii promyshlennogo proizvodstva SO AN SSSR, 1977. – S. 202-218.
4. Kolosov V.A., Vendina O.I., D. Eckert. Regional’nyye tsentry v usloviyakh globalizatsii : problemy sravnitel’nykh issledovaniy / Krupnyye goroda i vyzovy globalizatsii / [pod red. V.A. Kolosova i D.Ekkerta]. – Smolensk: Oykumena, 2003. – S. 5-15.
5. Coudroy de Lille Lydia, Albert Alexandre. The paths of internationalization for European metropolises : the case of Lyon // Ukr. geogr. z. – 2016. – № 2. – S. 32-38. https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2016.02.032
6. Lappo G.M. Bol’shiye goroda SSSR (prichiny i problemy razvitiya) / Prirodnyye resursy i territorial’naya organizatsiya khozyaystva. – M.: In-t geografii AN SSSR, 1979. – S. 114-124.
7. Lappo G.M. Opornyy karkas territorial’noy struktury narodnogo khozyaystva / Territorial’naya organizatsiya proizvoditel’nykh sil SSSR. – M.: Moskov. filial Geogr. obshch-va SSSR, 1978. – S. 3-25.
8. Metropoliyni funktsii krupnykh gorodov Ukrainy : potentsial razvitiya i perspektivy realizatsii. – L’vov: In-t regional’nykh issledovaniy im. M.I. Nizhnego NAN Ukrainy, 2016. – 552 s.
9. Osobennosti sovremennogo etapa urbanizatsii v kapitalisticheskikh i razvivayushchikhsya stranakh / L.I. Bonifat’yeva, V.M. Kharitonov / Krupneyshiye goroda kapitalisticheskikh i razvivayushchikhsya stran. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1987. – S. 4-18.
10. Savchuk I.. Polycentric development as a component of modern regional policy // Ukr. geogr. z. — 2013. — № 1. — S. 39-45. https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2013.01.039
11. Saint-Julien T. Politsentrizma i gradiyent «tsentr-periferiya» v zone vliyaniya Parizha / Krupnyye goroda i vyzovy globalizatsii [pod red. V.A. Kolosova i D.Eckert]. – Smolensk: Oykumena, 2003. – S. 139-152.
12. Sluka A.Ye. Naseleniye Zapadnoy Yevropy : vosproizvodstvo, migratsii, rasseleniye, zanyatost’ / Aleksandr Yevgen’yevich Sluka. – M.: Finansy i statistika, 1984. – 271 s.
13. Funktsii gorodov i ikh vliyaniye na prostranstvo / [pod red. L. Rudenko]. – M.: Feniks, 2015. – 292 s.
14. Eckert D. Mesto regional’nykh metropoliy v yevropeyskikh transportnykh setyakh : ot marginalizatsiya k integratsii / Krupnyye goroda i vyzovy globalizatsii [pod red. V.A. Kolosova i D.Ekkerta]. – Smolensk: Oykumena, 2003. – S. 25-36.
15. Bartaletti F. Città metropolitane e aree metropolitane. Il disegno politico e l’approccio scientifico // Rivista geographica italiana. — 2015. — Vol. 122, n 4. — P. 401-422.
16. BBSR. Metropolräume in Europa — [Електронний ресурс]. — Режим доступу: URL: http://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/Veroeffentlichungen/BerichteKompakt/2010/DL_4_2010.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
17. Berry B. Geography of Market Centers and Retail Distribution. — Endlewood Cliffs (N.J.) : Prentice-Hall, 1967. — 146 p.
18. Brunet R. Les villes europénnes. – Montpellier : DATAR, 1989. – 79 p.
19. Chilla T. L’Union Europénne a-t-elle une politique de développement des métropoles? // Bulletin de l’Association de Géographes Français. — 2012. — n 4. — P.558-569.
20. ESPON 111. Potentials for polycentric development in Europe. — Bruxelles : European Commission, 2005. — 348 p.
21. ESPON 143. Study of Urban Functions. — Bruxelles : European Commission, 2007. — 253 p.
22. Gottman J. The dynamics of large cities // The Geographical Journal. — 1974. — Vol. 140, part 2. — P. 254-61.
23. Il riordino territorial dello Stato / Rapporto annuale della Società Geografica Italiana. — Roma: Società Geografica Italiana, 2015. — 120 p.
24. Jouve B., Lefèvre C. Métropoles ingouvernables. — Paris : Elsevier, 2002. — 203 p.
25. Lévy J. Paris metropolitains, réseaux et territoires de l’espace parisien / Interdependances mondiales et implications lémaniques. — Genève : Georg, 1995. — P. 57-73.
26. Mattila J.M., Thompson W.R. The Mesurement of the Economic Base of the Metropolitan Area // Land Economics. — 1955. — Vol. 31. — P. 215-228.
27. Oliveira de, D.L. A emersão da região logístico-industrial do Extremo Oeste Metropolitano fluminense: reflexões sobre o processo contemporâneo de reestruturação territorial-produtiva // Espaço e Economia. — 2015. — Vol. IV, n 7. — [Електронний ресурс]. — Режим доступу: URL : http://espacoeconomia.revues.org/1814 ; DOI : 10.4000/espacoeconomia.1814
28. Reitel B. Vision européennes de la métropolisation: concepts globaux, enjeux et politiques nationales // Bulletin de l’Association de Géographes Français. — 2012. — n 4. — P. 503-511.
29. Rivière D. La question métropolitaine en Italie: entre competition et risqué de décohésion // Bulletin de l’Association de Géographes Français. — 2012. — n 4. — P. 523-533.
30. Sant’Anna M., Elias de Castro I., Socorro Rocha de M. Classificação dos municipios das régioes metropolitans, Segundo nivels da urbanização // Revista Brasiliera da Geographia. — 1977. — Vol. 39, n 4. — P. 56-81.
31. Schulz Ch. La politique des “Metropolregionen” en Allemange // Bulletin de l’Association de Géographes Français. – 2012. – n 4. – P.512-522.
Suggested citation:
Savchuk I. (2018) The role of foreign economic relations in the formation of metropolitan regions. Visnyk Kyivskogo nacionalnogo universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka GEOGRAFIYA [Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Geography], 2 (71), 23-29 (in Ukranian, abstr. in English).