Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка


Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv



Braychevskyy Y.

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

Electoral developments of the recent years reveal a clear trend of right-wing populist political movements gaining ever stronger support in the number of Western countries usually referred to as consolidated democracies. Unexpected victory of Donald Trump at both the Republican Party primaries and the national election 2016 in the USA is an especially striking example considering the provoking nature of his campaign widely accused of being populist and appealing to right-wing nationalist (racist) sentiments. Even more surprising was the level of support he gained among those categories of voters, who were expected to be his strongest opponents.

The article employs social context analysis as a tool for better understanding of the success Trump’s campaign has achieved in traditionally liberal states such as the Rust Belt in the north of the US or latino-dominated Florida. Tracing the evolution of the liberal-conservative split of the US society from the second half of the XXth century till present one can observe that traditional for the Democratic Party campaigning focus on race, gender and social justice issues coupled with the stress on foreign policy failed to appeal to the party’s base electorate. On the other hand, addressing the issues, which have, for a while now, been politically incorrect for open political debate, has helped the Trump’s team to really consolidate conservative supporters making him unexpectedly successful among his rivals from the Republican Party.

The case of the 2016 United States presidential election reveals that both liberal and conservative political elites have lost track of what really concerned the society thus allowing populist campaign to become successful where it was the least expected. Based on the electoral analysis of the United States of America, the paper argues that the crises of political elites losing their connection to their base electorate thus disrupting the efficiency of democratic representation constitutes the underlying reason for the worldwide rise of populist political parties and movements.

electoral geography, right-wing populism, western democracies, US presidential election.


DOI: http://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2017.68.28


  1. Variushyn, P.S., Tihotskaia I.S. Territorialnie factory elektoralnogo povedenia v Iaponii I SShA. [Territorial factors of electoral behavior in Japan and the USA]. // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seria 5. Geographia. 2016; 102-111.
  2. Variushyn, P.S. Metody issledovania geografii politicheskih predpochtenii naselenia SShA [The methods of studying political preferences of the population of the USA] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seria 5. Geographia. 2014; (4):. 42–47.
  3. Agnew, J. Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. London: Allen and Unwin, 1987.
  4. Agnew, J. Mapping politics: how context counts in electoral geography // Polrrical Geography. – 1996. – Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 129-146.
  5. Archer, J. C.; Taylor, P. J. Section and party: a political geography of American presidential elections, from Andrew Jackson to Ronald Reagan. Research Studies Press Limited, 1981.
  6. Barnett C., Low M. Geography and Democracy: An Introduction // C.Barnett & M.Low (eds.) Spaces of Democracy. Sage Publications. London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli, 2004.
  7. Betz, Hans-Georg. Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Springer, 1994.
  8. Brainy Quote. Martin Luther King, Jr. Quotes. – https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/m/martinluth115056.html
  9. Brug, Van der, W., & Fennema, M.. “The support base of radical right parties in the enlarged European Union.” European Integration5 (2009): 589-608.
  10. Diamond L. (ed.) Political culture and democracy in developing countries: Textbook edition. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1994
  11. Drezner D. (16 June 2016). “Why the post-truth political era might be around for a while”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
  12. Employment by major industry sector. Bureau of Labor Statistics. – https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_201.htm
  13. Fukuyama, F., The end of history and the last man. Simon and Schuster, 2006.
  14. GDP per Capita. United States of America. The World Bank. – http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?end=2015&locations=US&start=1994
  15. Gibson, Edward L. “The populist road to market reform: Policy and electoral coalitions in Mexico and Argentina.” World Politics 03 (1997): 339-370.
  16. Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. Bureau of Labor Statistics. – https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU04000000?years_option=all_years&periods_option=specific_periods&periods=Annual+Data
  17. Lipset, S.M., & Rokkan, S. Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments // S.M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (eds.) Party systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1967. – p.3-64.
  18. OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS. State Elections Offices. – http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2016/2016presgeresults.pdf
  19. Alvaredo, Facundo, et al. “The world wealth and income database.” – http://wid.world/country/usa/.
  20. Population and Demographic Data. Office of Economic and Demographic Research. – http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/population-demographics/data/
  21. Roberts R.S., Ufkes F.M., Shelley F.M. Populism and agrarian ideology: the 1982 Nebraska corporate farming referendum // Johnston R.J., Shelley F.M., Taylor P.J. (eds.) Developments in Electoral Geography. Routledge: London and New York, 1990.
  22. Schurr, C. Towards an emotional electoral geography: The performativity of emotions in electoral campaigning in Ecuador. Geoforum, 2013, 49: 114-126.
  23. Schramm, M. How we voted – by age, education, race and sexual orientation. – http://college.usatoday.com/2016/11/09/how-we-voted-by-age-education-race-and-sexual-orientation/
  24. Van Gent, W. P., Jansen, E. F., & Smits, J. H. (2014). Right-wing radical populism in city and suburbs: An electoral geography of the Partij Voor de Vrijheid in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 51(9), 1775-1794.
  25. Taylor, P. J. (2014). Extending the world of electoral geography. Developments in Electoral Geography (Routledge Library Editions: Political Geography), 7, 257

Download (.pdf)

Suggested citation:
Braychevskyy Y. (2017) Spreading politics of populism in western democracies: social-geographic analysis of the US presidential election 2016. Visnyk Kyivskogo natsionalnogo universytetu, Geografiya [Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Geography], 3-4 (68-69), 144-151 (in Ukrainian, abstr. in English).